top of page

Confidentiality Notice: Information in this design portfolio is confidential and unauthorized reproduction or disclosure is prohibited without permission. Unauthorized use, reproduction, or distribution of these materials is strictly prohibited. Thank you for respecting the confidentiality.

Project Details

Cross-team challenge to simplify navigation between the five existing account types within the XP ecosystem: Digital account, Global digital account, Crypto, Investments, and Global investments.

​

Company: XP inc
Year: 2022 - 2023

​

Product Design Team:

Design specialist: Fernanda Mercedes

Investiments: Douglas Ramos, Mariana Nietto

Global Investiments: Gustavo Schimiti

Cripto: Mariana Nietto

Digital and Global Account: Elen Oliveira

Checkout Investiments: Elen Oliveira

Problem

In XP's product ecosystem, there are 2 types of information: Accounts (Products) and Balances (Information).

​

A single account can have 1 or more balances, which makes accommodating the information more complex, in addition to a high cognitive load.

Number of accounts divided by national, international and cryptocurrency balances

Due to this business model, three main problems have been identified:
 

  1. Customers are not aware that there are multiple accounts, and when they discover this, they do not know the difference between them. They become confused about which one to use for investments and financial transactions.
     

  2. Customers get confused by having multiple accounts with different time limits and operational hours. As a result, sometimes they are unable to make payments or transactions even if they have funds in the app.
     

  3. Customers report delays in fund transfers, often lacking visibility of where their money is, which creates insecurity. They also do not receive feedback for all transactional events, leading to the feeling that the action was not performed.

Strategy and methodology

The main hypothesis to solve the problem was to have only one account per currency, which would address the three major customer issues by removing the complexity of navigating through multiple balances, aligning operational hours, optimizing workflows, and moving complexity to the backstage.

 

However, after several meetings with stakeholders, it became evident that this solution would have a greater financial impact, regulatory and legal implications, and would require significant effort from multiple teams involved.

Project scope

​

Therefore, due to the complexity of the solution, it was decided that the strategy for the initial phase would be to keep the accounts separate, simplifying the architecture and navigation of each one, minimizing the financial impact, and already offering value to the user while planning for a single account per currency in the long term.

Double diamond process

Flow mapping

Based on the AS-IS mapping of cross-border payment, investment, and investment redemption flows, we have identified various use cases. One notable case is the longest one, where the client attempts to invest or make transactions but realizes that they do not have a sufficient balance in the account associated with the desired product. As a result, they need to perform a transfer between accounts:

Investing in the domestic market: 17 steps

Investing in the global market: 22 steps

Investing in crypto: 17 steps

Paying bills: 15 steps

Flow Mapping as is app

After this mapping, we conducted several group work sessions where we identified an opportunity to simplify the flows. The key idea is to eliminate the need for prior transfers and allow the customer to choose the balance directly in the payment form. The complexity of managing the balances would be handled on the backend, resulting in a significant reduction in the number of steps involved:

Investing in the domestic market: 8 steps (reduction of 9 steps)

Investing in the global market: 8 steps (reduction of 14 steps)

Investing in crypto: 7 steps (reduction of 10 steps)

Paying bills: 7 steps (reduction of 8 steps)

Benchmark

For the initial stage of the ideation process, we conducted a benchmark with competitors to understand how they are addressing the problems we identified.

Featured features of Inter bank
Featured features of BTG
Featured features of Nubank
Featured features of Mercado Pago
Featured features of C bank

We also looked at other international players for inspiration:

Featured features of Revolut
Featured features of Acorns
Featured features of Wise
Featured features of Vivid
Featured features of Chime

Architecture and Wireframes

Once we had mapped the main opportunities and conducted competitor analysis, we began to outline what our solution would look like. In this stage, we explored various concepts to design the account architecture.

​

The main guideline was to ensure seamless communication between all accounts, removing complexity from the user and handling it in the backend.

Design concept the account architecture

With this initial version of the architecture, we created some low-fidelity wireframes to validate the concept with all project stakeholders.

Wireframes low fidelity

Design critique

In the wireframes, considering the initial problems and mainly reorganizing the app's layout, we created two concepts:

Version A has a customer usage horizon concept, where crypto carries the same weight as investments, and each balance intended for investment is placed in a second level of navigation.

Version B has the concept of balance for transactions and balance for investments, with crypto being placed in a second level within national investments, and we will have only one balance for investment (instead of 3).

To co-create and refine the concepts, I planned a workshop involving representatives from all the products that had an interface with the project, divided into two phases: one to critique the transactional flows and another dedicated to the home page of each product.

 

The workshop involved about 30 people from 6 different areas, and the objective was to determine what each concept could offer best, map the risks of each one, and refine the hypotheses.

Design critique results

Prototype and Testing

During the user testing phase, we conducted 3 rounds:

UX research flow with 3 steps

The first test was an quantitative unmoderated usability test using the Maze tool, where we presented a low-fidelity prototype to prevent information leakage.

 

The main objective of this stage was to understand the customer's path to find each account type and assess if it is clear to them what each one is for (investing vs. transacting).

Maze results heat map
Gif low-fidelity prototype Vertion A
Gif low-fidelity prototype Vertion B

In the interviews with advisors using a qualitative concept testing methodology, we presented both versions and sought to understand the perception of the advisors who interact with end users on a daily basis.

Insights of qualitative concept testing

In the creation of the high-fidelity prototype, we have already made adjustments based on the learnings from previous stages, and we proceeded to conduct qualitative usability testing with end users. The main objective of this testing was to refine the final user experience that would be proposed.

Gif high-fidelity prototype homepage
Gif high-fidelity prototype investiments area
Gif high-fidelity prototype digital accounts
Gif high-fidelity prototype investiments accounts
Gif high-fidelity prototype checkout

Interface and delivery

After the tests, we refined the User Interfaces and proceeded to create the handoff documentation to deliver the project.

Main changes made to the homepage
Main changes made to digital accounts
Main changes made to investments area
Main changes made to investments accounts
Main changes made to checkout

Accessibility and Metrics

Ensuring accessibility and tracking metrics have been an integral part of our project. We have implemented various measures to make our system more accessible to users with disabilities, such as providing alternative text for images, ensuring compatibility with assistive technologies and screen readers, and adhering to WCAG guidelines.

Handoff accessbility

In terms of metrics, we have delivered a robust tracking framework to monitor and collect data on user interactions, user flow, and overall system performance. This data helps us analyze user behavior, identify areas for improvement, and make data-driven decisions to enhance the user experience.

Handoff metrics

Learnings

Throughout this project, I faced my biggest professional challenge at XP Inc. It was an intense endeavor due to the project's size, involvement of various stakeholders, and tight deadline. However, I can say that the learnings were invaluable.

​

Through the project, I was able to enhance my ability to create intuitive and visually appealing interfaces. I gained an understanding of the importance of UX writing in using clear and concise language to guide users. I had the opportunity to deepen my knowledge of UX research through various methods. I also recognized the significance of measuring UX metrics and prioritizing digital accessibility from the start.

​

Overall, this project was a challenging yet rewarding journey. I had the opportunity to refine multiple skills and I am proud of the achieved outcome. I am grateful for the experience of being part of this large-scale project at XP Inc.

© 2024. Elen Oliveira – Product Designer.

bottom of page